PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
90.58%
Growth of 90.58% while FURY shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
94.02%
Cost growth of 94.02% while FURY maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
81.32%
Growth of 81.32% while FURY shows flat gross profit. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
-4.86%
Margin decline while FURY shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-58.30%
G&A reduction while FURY shows 30.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.87%
Other expenses reduction while FURY shows 40.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-37.70%
Operating expenses reduction while FURY shows 32.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
54.52%
Total costs growth above 1.5x FURY's 32.81%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
456.58%
Interest expense growth while FURY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
141.56%
D&A growth while FURY reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
705.60%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x FURY's 34.20%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
417.76%
Margin change of 417.76% while FURY is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
56.24%
Operating income growth while FURY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-18.02%
Operating margin decline while FURY shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
81.20%
Other expenses growth less than half of FURY's 504.26%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
306.85%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x FURY's 33.87%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
208.54%
Margin change of 208.54% while FURY is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
60.09%
Tax expense change of 60.09% while FURY maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
169.04%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x FURY's 33.27%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
136.23%
Margin change of 136.23% while FURY is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
168.18%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x FURY's 50.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
159.09%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x FURY's 50.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.78%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x FURY's 7.59%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
20.22%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FURY's 5.93%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.