10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.40%
Growth of 4.40% while FURY shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
4.97%
Cost increase while FURY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
3.99%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x FURY's 3.13%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-0.39%
Margin decline while FURY shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.80%
Similar G&A growth to FURY's 22.19%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry cost structures.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.95%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-4.60%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
3.48%
Total costs growth while FURY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-42.71%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
11.08%
D&A change of 11.08% while FURY maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-243.18%
EBITDA decline while FURY shows 26.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-237.15%
EBITDA margin decline while FURY shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-37.40%
Operating income decline while FURY shows 14.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-40.03%
Operating margin decline while FURY shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-321.81%
Other expenses reduction while FURY shows 63.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-391.21%
Pre-tax income decline while FURY shows 26.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-378.95%
Pre-tax margin decline while FURY shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-45.02%
Tax expense reduction while FURY shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1188.31%
Net income decline while FURY shows 30.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1142.45%
Net margin decline while FURY shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1224.26%
EPS decline while FURY shows 30.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1287.50%
Diluted EPS decline while FURY shows 30.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.22%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x FURY's 9.45%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-5.12%
Diluted share reduction while FURY shows 0.02% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.