PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.59%
Revenue decline while FURY shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-4.74%
Cost reduction while FURY shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-7.58%
Gross profit decline while FURY shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.06%
Margin decline while FURY shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.63%
Similar G&A growth to FURY's 49.61%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry cost structures.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.20%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-10.44%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-6.74%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-45.49%
Interest expense reduction while FURY shows 50.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-8.30%
D&A reduction while FURY shows 1.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-0.37%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.66%
Margin change of 6.66% while FURY is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-35.23%
Operating income decline while FURY shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.66%
Operating margin decline while FURY shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
151.24%
Other expenses growth while FURY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.04%
Pre-tax income growth while FURY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.31%
Margin change of 10.31% while FURY is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-12.58%
Tax expense reduction while FURY shows 100.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
23.38%
Net income growth while FURY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
32.08%
Margin change of 32.08% while FURY is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
24.09%
EPS growth while FURY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.58%
Diluted EPS growth while FURY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.43%
Share count change of 0.43% while FURY is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
-3.86%
Diluted share reduction while FURY shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.