10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
15.76%
Growth of 15.76% while ITRG shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
1.95%
Cost growth less than half of ITRG's 5.53%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
23.93%
Positive growth while ITRG shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
7.06%
Margin change of 7.06% while ITRG shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.23%
G&A growth while ITRG reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.96%
Other expenses reduction while ITRG shows 82.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-15.76%
Operating expenses reduction while ITRG shows 49.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-8.71%
Total costs reduction while ITRG shows 47.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.23%
Interest expense reduction while ITRG shows 60.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-78.53%
D&A reduction while ITRG shows 51.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
40.53%
EBITDA growth while ITRG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.39%
Margin change of 21.39% while ITRG is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
105.71%
Operating income growth while ITRG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
77.70%
Margin change of 77.70% while ITRG is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-1117.48%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
27.73%
Pre-tax income growth while ITRG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.34%
Margin change of 10.34% while ITRG is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-39.31%
Tax expense reduction while ITRG shows 251.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
110.12%
Net income growth while ITRG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
81.51%
Margin change of 81.51% while ITRG is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
95.24%
EPS growth while ITRG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
105.00%
Diluted EPS growth while ITRG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.91%
Share count reduction below 50% of ITRG's 7.94%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
8.53%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of ITRG's 8.82%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.