PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
15.92%
Growth of 15.92% while ITRG shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
14.67%
Cost growth 50-75% of ITRG's 26.72%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
16.66%
Positive growth while ITRG shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.63%
Margin change of 0.63% while ITRG shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.50%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.83%
Other expenses growth while ITRG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.07%
Operating expenses reduction while ITRG shows 1.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
8.77%
Total costs growth above 1.5x ITRG's 2.75%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-16.91%
Interest expense reduction while ITRG shows 8.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
16.33%
D&A growth 1.25-1.5x ITRG's 12.74%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize asset base.
22.56%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x ITRG's 0.08%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
5.73%
Margin change of 5.73% while ITRG is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
70.99%
Operating income growth while ITRG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
47.50%
Margin change of 47.50% while ITRG is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-244.28%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
31.80%
Pre-tax income growth while ITRG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.70%
Margin change of 13.70% while ITRG is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
130.66%
Similar tax expense growth to ITRG's 159.88%. Walter Schloss would investigate patterns.
-3.08%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.39%
Net margin decline while ITRG shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.95%
Diluted EPS decline while ITRG shows 31.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.08%
Share count reduction while ITRG shows 73.66% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
1.15%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x ITRG's 73.66%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.