10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.40%
Growth of 4.40% while ITRG shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
4.97%
Cost increase while ITRG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
3.99%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x ITRG's 2.40%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.39%
Margin decline while ITRG shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.80%
G&A growth 1.1-1.25x ITRG's 17.89%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of necessary spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.95%
Other expenses reduction while ITRG shows 242.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-4.60%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
3.48%
Total costs growth while ITRG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-42.71%
Interest expense reduction while ITRG shows 2.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
11.08%
D&A growth while ITRG reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-243.18%
EBITDA decline while ITRG shows 20.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-237.15%
EBITDA margin decline while ITRG shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-37.40%
Operating income decline while ITRG shows 20.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-40.03%
Operating margin decline while ITRG shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-321.81%
Other expenses reduction while ITRG shows 1594.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-391.21%
Pre-tax income decline while ITRG shows 13.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-378.95%
Pre-tax margin decline while ITRG shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-45.02%
Tax expense reduction while ITRG shows 20.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1188.31%
Net income decline while ITRG shows 13.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1142.45%
Net margin decline while ITRG shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1224.26%
EPS decline while ITRG shows 8.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1287.50%
Diluted EPS decline while ITRG shows 16.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.22%
Share count increase while ITRG reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-5.12%
Diluted share reduction while ITRG shows 0.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.