10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17.43%
Growth of 17.43% while ITRG shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
14.49%
Cost increase while ITRG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
19.06%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x ITRG's 0.24%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1.39%
Margin change of 1.39% while ITRG shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.36%
G&A growth less than half of ITRG's 48.64%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
105.20%
Other expenses growth while ITRG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
62.19%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ITRG's 8.58%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
27.63%
Total costs growth above 1.5x ITRG's 8.25%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-21.72%
Interest expense reduction while ITRG shows 5.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
20.79%
D&A growth while ITRG reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.70%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x ITRG's 0.72%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-12.54%
EBITDA margin decline while ITRG shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
51.47%
Operating income growth while ITRG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
28.99%
Margin change of 28.99% while ITRG is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-373.34%
Other expenses reduction while ITRG shows 65.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.13%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of ITRG's 0.23%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-14.73%
Pre-tax margin decline while ITRG shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
13.08%
Tax expense change of 13.08% while ITRG maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
-12.86%
Net income decline while ITRG shows 0.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.79%
Net margin decline while ITRG shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.50%
EPS decline while ITRG shows 0.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.31%
Diluted EPS decline while ITRG shows 0.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.72%
Share count change of 0.72% while ITRG is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.48%
Diluted share change of 0.48% while ITRG is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.