PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
869.08%
Growth of 869.08% while THM shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
742.49%
Cost growth of 742.49% while THM maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
924.01%
Growth of 924.01% while THM shows flat gross profit. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
5.67%
Margin change of 5.67% while THM shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
65.13%
G&A growth while THM reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while THM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
1732.78%
Other expenses growth less than half of THM's 14455.15%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
13.78%
Operating expenses growth while THM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
148.48%
Total costs growth while THM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
122.07%
Interest expense change of 122.07% while THM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
1002.94%
D&A change of 1002.94% while THM maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
1185.46%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x THM's 34.52%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
212.01%
Margin change of 212.01% while THM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
943.63%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x THM's 34.52%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
187.06%
Margin change of 187.06% while THM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
35.40%
Other expenses growth while THM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
522.82%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x THM's 29.69%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
143.63%
Margin change of 143.63% while THM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
474.29%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x THM's 29.69%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
138.62%
Margin change of 138.62% while THM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
143.75%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x THM's 28.85%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
142.75%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x THM's 28.85%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
8.35%
Share count reduction below 50% of THM's 0.02%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
10.81%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of THM's 0.02%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.