10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.72%
Growth of 1.72% while THM shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
15.46%
Cost growth of 15.46% while THM maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
-6.23%
Gross profit decline while THM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-7.82%
Margin decline while THM shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.42%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.97%
Other expenses growth while THM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
35.94%
Operating expenses growth while THM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
22.00%
Total costs growth while THM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
23.83%
Interest expense change of 23.83% while THM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
10.71%
D&A growth while THM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-13.47%
EBITDA decline while THM shows 46.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.94%
EBITDA margin decline while THM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.23%
Operating income decline while THM shows 50.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.82%
Operating margin decline while THM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.31%
Other expenses reduction while THM shows 80.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-24.85%
Pre-tax income decline while THM shows 51.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.13%
Pre-tax margin decline while THM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
14.78%
Tax expense growth less than half of THM's 3304.74%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-58.14%
Net income decline while THM shows 51.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-58.84%
Net margin decline while THM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-57.75%
EPS decline while THM shows 52.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-59.49%
Diluted EPS decline while THM shows 52.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.14%
Share count reduction while THM shows 0.26% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.64%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of THM's 0.26%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.