PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
25.70%
Growth of 25.70% while THM shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
5.67%
Cost growth of 5.67% while THM maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
40.49%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x THM's 0.01%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
11.77%
Margin change of 11.77% while THM shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.07%
G&A reduction while THM shows 96.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while THM shows 365.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
32.58%
Other expenses growth while THM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.48%
Operating expenses growth less than half of THM's 143.51%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
6.96%
Total costs growth less than half of THM's 143.51%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
6.04%
Interest expense change of 6.04% while THM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
8.68%
D&A growth while THM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
52.32%
EBITDA growth while THM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.18%
Margin change of 21.18% while THM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
51.02%
Operating income growth while THM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.14%
Margin change of 20.14% while THM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
1409.26%
Other expenses growth while THM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
69.45%
Pre-tax income growth while THM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
34.80%
Margin change of 34.80% while THM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
115.82%
Tax expense growth while THM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
39.40%
Net income growth while THM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.90%
Margin change of 10.90% while THM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
38.22%
EPS growth while THM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
37.03%
Diluted EPS growth while THM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.92%
Share count reduction below 50% of THM's 0.36%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.62%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of THM's 0.36%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.