40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-5.51%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-5.51% vs CRK's -15.25%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.51%
Below half of CRK's -22.45%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
3.32%
Higher Net Receivables Growth compared to CRK's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.97%
Other current assets growth 50-75% of CRK's 15.53%. Bruce Berkowitz notes fewer expansions. Possibly simpler working capital.
4.70%
Below half of CRK's -7.41%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-6.33%
Below half CRK's 6.11%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
0.57%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to CRK's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.57%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to CRK's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-13.74%
Both CRK and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
625.85%
Above 1.5x CRK's 257.87%. Michael Burry warns of potential hidden liabilities or intangible bloat.
1.58%
Below half of CRK's 6.02%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.81%
Below half of CRK's 5.10%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-7.31%
Less than half of CRK's 8.36%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
33.84%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to CRK's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.42%
1.25-1.5x CRK's -28.64%. Martin Whitman sees a potentially higher near-term liability load.
7.75%
1.1-1.25x CRK's 6.46%. Bill Ackman questions if the firm is taking on more near-term obligations than competitor.
0.11%
Less than half of CRK's 15.95%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
5.96%
Higher Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth compared to CRK's zero value, indicating better performance.
1.99%
Above 1.5x CRK's 0.74%. Michael Burry sees a much bigger deferred tax load building up.
-25.00%
Less than half of CRK's 0.78%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
1.90%
Less than half of CRK's 11.78%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.14%
Less than half of CRK's 10.91%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.20%
Below half CRK's 0.70%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
10.58%
Less than half of CRK's -25.70%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.44%
Below half CRK's -0.20%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
1.81%
Below half CRK's 5.10%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-13.74%
0.5-0.75x CRK's -22.82%. Martin Whitman sees possible missed opportunities vs. competitor.
5.89%
Less than half of CRK's 15.95%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
6.07%
Less than half of CRK's 16.17%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.