40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-5.67%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-5.67% vs EQT's -53.63%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.67%
Below half of EQT's -53.63%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-6.37%
Receivables growth less than half of EQT's -15.41%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
100.00%
Inventory growth above 1.5x EQT's 16.20%. Michael Burry might suspect a looming inventory glut. Check free cash flow impact.
36.97%
Other current assets growth 50-75% of EQT's 49.51%. Bruce Berkowitz notes fewer expansions. Possibly simpler working capital.
2.52%
Below half of EQT's -13.37%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
3.24%
0.5-0.75x EQT's 4.79%. Martin Whitman might see a risk of falling behind in asset investment or shifting strategy.
2.12%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to EQT's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.12%
Less than half of EQT's -5.31%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
-31.12%
Below half of EQT's 2.81%. Michael Burry sees possible underinvestment in long-term assets. Verify capital constraints.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.55%
Less than half of EQT's -0.82%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
3.44%
0.5-0.75x EQT's 4.59%. Martin Whitman wonders if there's insufficient reinvestment vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.34%
1.25-1.5x EQT's 2.24%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a stronger asset build. Check if it's producing returns.
7.05%
Less than half of EQT's -1.98%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-100.00%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to EQT's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.04%
Less than half of EQT's 14.86%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-2.61%
Less than half of EQT's 8.00%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
0.44%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to EQT's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.43%
Above 1.5x EQT's 5.31%. Michael Burry sees a much bigger deferred tax load building up.
6.64%
Similar yoy changes to EQT's 8.34%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions in other LT liabilities.
4.28%
Above 1.5x EQT's 1.87%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.28%
1.1-1.25x EQT's 2.65%. Bill Ackman questions if the firm is incurring more total obligations than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.07%
≥ 1.5x EQT's 0.21%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
20.08%
Less than half of EQT's 247.95%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.40%
≥ 1.5x EQT's 1.73%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
3.34%
1.25-1.5x EQT's 2.24%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if expansions are well-justified by ROI.
-31.12%
Below half EQT's 2.81%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-2.15%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to EQT's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-1.32%
Less than half of EQT's 14.98%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
