40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
192.64%
Cash & equivalents growing 192.64% while PR's declined -35.78%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
192.64%
Below half of PR's -35.78%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-37.35%
Receivables growth above 1.5x PR's -2.93%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
25.90%
Higher Inventory Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-34.09%
Other current assets growth < half of PR's 46.78%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-2.01%
Below half of PR's -15.31%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
5.15%
1.25-1.5x PR's 4.28%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a significant push to expand capacity faster than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.31%
Less than half of PR's 24.36%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
4.85%
1.25-1.5x PR's 3.98%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if expansions surpass competitor's pace but remain justified.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.27%
1.25-1.5x PR's 2.45%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a stronger asset build. Check if it's producing returns.
-32.73%
Less than half of PR's 1488.74%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-73.32%
Less than half of PR's 24.99%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
73.38%
Less than half of PR's -18.46%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-17.43%
Less than half of PR's 15.37%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
130.13%
Above 1.5x PR's 0.03%. Michael Burry suspects significant leverage additions. Check coverage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.24%
Less than half of PR's 8.51%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-2.88%
Less than half of PR's 10.69%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
20.64%
Above 1.5x PR's 1.57%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.87%
Similar yoy to PR's 5.06%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions in total liabilities.
2.62%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
0.79%
Below half PR's 7.68%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-5073.64%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
49995900.00%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
0.67%
0.75-0.9x PR's 0.79%. Bill Ackman wonders if competitor is growing equity faster.
3.27%
1.25-1.5x PR's 2.45%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if expansions are well-justified by ROI.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
49.64%
Less than half of PR's -0.11%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
10.23%
1.25-1.5x PR's 7.15%. Martin Whitman is wary of heavier net leverage vs. competitor.
