40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-46.16%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-46.16% vs PR's -35.78%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-46.16%
Cash + STI yoy 1.25-1.5x PR's -35.78%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if the firm is preparing for expansions or simply hoarding.
-47.39%
Receivables growth above 1.5x PR's -2.93%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
-48.53%
Higher Inventory Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-76.94%
Other current assets growth < half of PR's 46.78%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-52.12%
≥ 1.5x PR's -15.31%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
3.20%
0.5-0.75x PR's 4.28%. Martin Whitman might see a risk of falling behind in asset investment or shifting strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.00%
Less than half of PR's 24.36%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
3.31%
0.75-0.9x PR's 3.98%. Bill Ackman questions if the competitor invests more robustly in future growth.
100.00%
Higher Other Assets Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-8.82%
Below half of PR's 2.45%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-52.29%
Less than half of PR's 1488.74%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
19.70%
Similar yoy changes to PR's 24.99%. Walter Schloss finds a parallel approach to short-term funding.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.15%
Exceeding 1.5x PR's -18.46%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
-41.71%
Less than half of PR's 15.37%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-1.29%
Less than half of PR's 0.03%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Both PR and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
1.84%
Less than half of PR's 8.51%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-23.64%
Less than half of PR's 10.69%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-1.92%
Less than half of PR's 1.57%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.89%
Less than half of PR's 5.06%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
8.85%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1.16%
Below half PR's 7.68%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-2.55%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-100.00%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1.45%
≥ 1.5x PR's 0.79%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
-8.82%
Below half PR's 2.45%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.19%
Less than half of PR's -0.11%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
34.10%
Above 1.5x PR's 7.15%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.
