40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-47.04%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-47.04% vs PR's -35.78%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-47.04%
Cash + STI yoy 1.25-1.5x PR's -35.78%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if the firm is preparing for expansions or simply hoarding.
-3.37%
Receivables growth 1.1-1.25x PR's -2.93%. Bill Ackman would demand reasons for extending more credit than the competitor.
39.43%
Higher Inventory Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
28.95%
Other current assets growth 50-75% of PR's 46.78%. Bruce Berkowitz notes fewer expansions. Possibly simpler working capital.
6.86%
Below half of PR's -15.31%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
2.26%
0.5-0.75x PR's 4.28%. Martin Whitman might see a risk of falling behind in asset investment or shifting strategy.
-0.05%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.05%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.32%
Less than half of PR's 24.36%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
1.88%
Below half of PR's 3.98%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.32%
Similar yoy to PR's 2.45%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions. Evaluate the quality of these assets.
-5.64%
Less than half of PR's 1488.74%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-100.00%
Less than half of PR's 24.99%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.47%
1.1-1.25x PR's -18.46%. Bill Ackman wonders if the firm is incurring more one-time charges than competitor.
-13.00%
Less than half of PR's 15.37%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
8.11%
Above 1.5x PR's 0.03%. Michael Burry suspects significant leverage additions. Check coverage.
-50.00%
Both PR and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
6.89%
Similar yoy changes to PR's 8.51%. Walter Schloss sees parallel tax deferral patterns.
0.78%
Less than half of PR's 10.69%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
6.96%
Above 1.5x PR's 1.57%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.34%
Less than half of PR's 5.06%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.67%
0.5-0.75x PR's 7.68%. Martin Whitman is wary of weaker retention or lower profitability.
-0.40%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-100.00%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
2.31%
≥ 1.5x PR's 0.79%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
2.32%
Similar yoy to PR's 2.45%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions in total capital.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.76%
Less than half of PR's -0.11%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
9.20%
1.25-1.5x PR's 7.15%. Martin Whitman is wary of heavier net leverage vs. competitor.
