40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
162.38%
Cash & equivalents growing 162.38% while PR's declined -76.34%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
162.38%
Below half of PR's -76.34%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-0.08%
Receivables growth less than half of PR's 14.17%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-100.00%
Higher Inventory Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
11.20%
Other current assets growth < half of PR's 111776.67%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
96.09%
Below half of PR's -7.46%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-7.56%
Below half PR's 25.23%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
-22.39%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.39%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-32.94%
Both PR and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
-62.87%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-19.37%
Less than half of PR's 1074.18%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-12.60%
Below half of PR's 26.93%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.95%
0.5-0.75x PR's 21.96%. Martin Whitman worries about slower asset growth than competitor. Is it strategy or constraint?
5.78%
Less than half of PR's -55.06%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.00%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-80.77%
Less than half of PR's 1336.11%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-2.16%
Less than half of PR's 42.74%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-0.57%
Less than half of PR's 73.33%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
-2.52%
Both PR and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
22.32%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
10.40%
Above 1.5x PR's 1.43%. Michael Burry suspects a looming risk from large additions to LT liabilities.
0.95%
Less than half of PR's 69.10%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.36%
Less than half of PR's 56.54%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
-0.18%
Less than half of PR's 7.05%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
120.52%
Higher Retained Earnings Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating better performance.
-8.22%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
0.18%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
39.51%
≥ 1.5x PR's 7.05%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
13.95%
0.5-0.75x PR's 21.96%. Martin Whitman sees underexpansion or possible missed opportunities.
-32.94%
Both PR and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
-1.84%
Less than half of PR's 73.33%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-79.49%
Less than half of PR's 485.56%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
