40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
161.43%
Cash & equivalents growing 161.43% while PR's declined -82.33%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
161.43%
Below half of PR's -82.33%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
50.63%
Higher Net Receivables Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-95.77%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
35.39%
Below half of PR's -48.82%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-7.92%
Both PR and the company show zero PP&E (Net) Growth.
-1.31%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.31%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.06%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-1.09%
Higher Other Non-Current Assets Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-5.88%
Below half of PR's 0.05%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.34%
≥ 1.5x PR's -0.04%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
-9.31%
Higher Accounts Payable Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.50%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.73%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-6.96%
Less than half of PR's 15000.00%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-26.22%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-4.94%
Both PR and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-86.29%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-18.26%
Higher Total Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.71%
Less than half of PR's 1.71%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
19.80%
Less than half of PR's -0.11%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
25.19%
Below half PR's -838.24%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
3.09%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
100.00%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
27.00%
Below half PR's -0.11%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-2.34%
≥ 1.5x PR's -0.04%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.74%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-28.30%
Less than half of PR's 120.86%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
