40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
125.06%
Cash & equivalents changing 125.06% while PR's remains stable. Warren Buffett would analyze the strategic implications of this divergence.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
125.06%
Higher Cash + Short-Term Investments Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating better performance.
-1.30%
Receivables growth less than half of PR's 43.04%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.21%
Similar to PR's -30.11%. Walter Schloss would confirm standard short-term asset patterns.
24.86%
Below half of PR's 52.94%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
1.74%
Below half PR's 4.77%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
-6.75%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.75%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-37.78%
Both PR and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
-12.06%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1.52%
Less than half of PR's 692.51%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-2.15%
Below half of PR's 5.08%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.03%
Below half of PR's 5.68%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
2.90%
Less than half of PR's -21.01%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.00%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-46.46%
Less than half of PR's 35.36%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
3.95%
Less than half of PR's 14.41%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-0.02%
Less than half of PR's 371.43%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
-14.60%
Below half PR's -36082.89%. Michael Burry suspects a serious gap in multi-year pipeline.
3.13%
Less than half of PR's 90.78%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
6.22%
50-75% of PR's 10.44%. Bruce Berkowitz sees fewer new long-term commitments.
-1.14%
Less than half of PR's 262.09%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.33%
Less than half of PR's 90.35%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.02%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
60.00%
0.75-0.9x PR's 66.71%. Bill Ackman questions if competitor reinvests profits more robustly.
-8.64%
Less than half of PR's 28.07%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.68%
≥ 1.5x PR's 0.67%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
1.03%
Below half PR's 5.68%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-37.78%
Both PR and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
0.48%
Less than half of PR's 371.43%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-8.56%
Less than half of PR's 364.05%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
