40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-19.12%
Cash & equivalents declining -19.12% while PR's grows 4445.33%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.12%
Below half of PR's 4445.33%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-41.02%
Receivables growth less than half of PR's 59.86%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
627.10%
Other current assets growth < half of PR's -66.87%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
2.76%
Below half of PR's 241.77%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
2.99%
0.5-0.75x PR's 5.68%. Martin Whitman might see a risk of falling behind in asset investment or shifting strategy.
-0.15%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.15%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-69.05%
Both PR and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
-27.01%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
171.64%
1.1-1.25x PR's 152.03%. Bill Ackman questions if the firm invests in intangible or other non-core areas more aggressively.
0.32%
Below half of PR's 6.18%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.68%
Below half of PR's 10.44%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-78.82%
Less than half of PR's 82.18%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.67%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2064.29%
Exceeding 1.5x PR's 25.15%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
21.02%
Less than half of PR's 45.88%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.30%
Below half PR's -128.76%. Michael Burry suspects a serious gap in multi-year pipeline.
3.03%
Less than half of PR's -42.79%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
0.45%
Less than half of PR's 30.37%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
0.76%
Less than half of PR's 115.43%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.15%
Less than half of PR's 86.44%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
-22.21%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-130.65%
Below half PR's 84.58%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
0.58%
Less than half of PR's -75.34%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.40%
Below half PR's 3.42%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
0.68%
Below half PR's 10.44%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-69.05%
Both PR and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
0.84%
Less than half of PR's 136.83%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
4.40%
Less than half of PR's 68.36%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
