40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
146.58%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth 1.25-1.5x VET's 102.79%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if higher cash accumulation is strategic or just idle.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
146.58%
Cash + STI yoy 1.25-1.5x VET's 102.79%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if the firm is preparing for expansions or simply hoarding.
18.74%
Receivables growth above 1.5x VET's 9.51%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
-1.08%
Inventory growth below half of VET's 88.83%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
100.00%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
23.96%
0.75-0.9x VET's 28.07%. Bill Ackman would ask if competitor is building short-term resources more aggressively.
-0.23%
Below half VET's 16.04%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.44%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-4.44%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.35%
Less than half of VET's -99.08%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-2.10%
Below half of VET's 4.40%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.20%
Below half of VET's 6.35%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
12.43%
Less than half of VET's 27.83%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
88.90%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both VET and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
-58.54%
Less than half of VET's 10.33%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
3.36%
Less than half of VET's 14.04%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
5.47%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-2.28%
Both VET and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
-1.56%
Less than half of VET's 1.91%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-15.89%
Less than half of VET's 4.17%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
0.53%
Less than half of VET's 2.06%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.92%
Less than half of VET's 9.50%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
-4.15%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-0.86%
Below half VET's 4.55%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
1221.00%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-121000565.93%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-1.63%
Below half VET's 2.43%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-0.20%
Below half VET's 6.35%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.65%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
3.52%
Less than half of VET's -102.79%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
