40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-28.01%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-28.01% vs VET's -9.71%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.01%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x VET's -9.71%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
-34.82%
Receivables growth above 1.5x VET's -6.52%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
-84.84%
Inventory growth below half of VET's 20.89%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
108.72%
Other current assets growth < half of VET's 434.86%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-18.19%
≥ 1.5x VET's -2.43%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
4.25%
Below half VET's 11.05%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-2.78%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.20%
Similar yoy growth to VET's 26.77%. Walter Schloss sees parallel approach in non-core expansions.
5.65%
Below half of VET's 14.28%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
-100.00%
Higher Other Assets Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
2.50%
Below half of VET's 11.88%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
11.54%
Less than half of VET's -5.61%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-66.63%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.23%
50-75% of VET's -37.78%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a more controlled liability line.
-10.25%
50-75% of VET's -14.46%. Bruce Berkowitz notes the firm keeps current liabilities growth relatively low.
-18.42%
Less than half of VET's 47.99%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Both VET and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
14.72%
50-75% of VET's 25.99%. Bruce Berkowitz notes relatively lower DTL growth.
0.34%
Less than half of VET's 5.04%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-5.89%
Less than half of VET's 32.96%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
-100.00%
Higher Other Liabilities Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-7.10%
Less than half of VET's 20.66%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.57%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
32.20%
Similar yoy to VET's 35.25%. Walter Schloss sees parallel earnings retention vs. competitor.
-10.21%
Less than half of VET's -100.00%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
-100.00%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
16.09%
≥ 1.5x VET's 4.85%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
2.50%
Below half VET's 11.88%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.67%
Less than half of VET's 47.99%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-19.52%
Less than half of VET's 68.12%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
