40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-47.04%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-47.04% vs VET's -60.20%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-47.04%
Cash + STI yoy 0.75-0.9x VET's -60.20%. Bill Ackman would wonder if competitor is building liquidity more aggressively.
-3.37%
Receivables growth less than half of VET's 52.24%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
39.43%
Inventory growth above 1.5x VET's 7.65%. Michael Burry might suspect a looming inventory glut. Check free cash flow impact.
28.95%
Other current assets growth < half of VET's -12.84%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
6.86%
Below half of VET's -25.74%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
2.26%
Below half VET's 28.50%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
-0.05%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.05%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.32%
Less than half of VET's 5.43%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
1.88%
Below half of VET's 26.47%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.32%
Below half of VET's 14.60%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-5.64%
Less than half of VET's 53.93%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-100.00%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.47%
Exceeding 1.5x VET's -5.91%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
-13.00%
Less than half of VET's 37.97%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
8.11%
Similar yoy to VET's 7.45%. Walter Schloss sees parallel approaches to long-term financing.
-50.00%
Both VET and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
6.89%
Less than half of VET's 42.15%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
0.78%
Less than half of VET's 29.68%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
6.96%
Less than half of VET's 18.59%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.34%
Less than half of VET's 21.75%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.67%
Below half VET's 248.90%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-0.40%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-100.00%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
2.31%
Below half VET's 4.89%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
2.32%
Below half VET's 14.60%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.76%
Similar yoy changes to VET's 7.45%. Walter Schloss notes parallel total debt strategies.
9.20%
Less than half of VET's 78.33%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
