40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
60.67%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth below half of VET's 247.33%. Michael Burry would question if the firm faces a liquidity squeeze. Check for rising debts or negative cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.67%
Below half of VET's 247.07%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
22.23%
Receivables growth less than half of VET's -5.76%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
21.79%
Inventory growth 1.25-1.5x VET's 15.68%. Martin Whitman worries about slower turnover or potential markdown risk.
-83.44%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
10.71%
Below half of VET's 60.95%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
0.21%
Below half VET's 2.51%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
-3.27%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.27%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-100.00%
Both VET and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
100.00%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1.53%
Less than half of VET's 4.18%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
0.09%
Below half of VET's 2.63%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.10%
Below half of VET's 9.14%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
1.35%
Less than half of VET's 24.46%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-3.47%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-100.00%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1066.47%
Exceeding 1.5x VET's 68.31%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
17.23%
50-75% of VET's 30.79%. Bruce Berkowitz notes the firm keeps current liabilities growth relatively low.
6.59%
50-75% of VET's 10.56%. Bruce Berkowitz notes less new LT debt than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.86%
Less than half of VET's 10.80%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-1.06%
Less than half of VET's 14.62%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
1.46%
Less than half of VET's 11.42%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.26%
Less than half of VET's 14.42%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.39%
Below half VET's -8.62%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-13.11%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.18%
Below half VET's 1.79%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
1.10%
Below half VET's 9.14%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Similar yoy to VET's -100.00%. Walter Schloss notes parallel moves in the investment portfolio.
5.85%
50-75% of VET's 10.56%. Bruce Berkowitz sees relatively smaller yoy debt additions.
2.48%
Less than half of VET's -17.46%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
