40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-12.43%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-12.43% vs VET's -63.86%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.43%
Below half of VET's -63.86%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
25.45%
Receivables growth 50-75% of VET's 50.15%. Bruce Berkowitz would note relatively tighter receivables. Check if sales remain robust.
41.01%
Inventory growth below half of VET's -73.42%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
134.65%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
24.31%
Below half of VET's -17.52%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
3.14%
Below half VET's -2.15%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
0.81%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.81%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.11%
Above 1.5x VET's 0.68%. Michael Burry warns of potential hidden liabilities or intangible bloat.
3.07%
Below half of VET's -1.87%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
-100.00%
Higher Other Assets Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
5.27%
Below half of VET's -4.45%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
12.95%
Above 1.5x VET's 6.23%. Michael Burry questions if payables are being stretched to avoid short-term borrowing.
-27.65%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both VET and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
16.91%
Less than half of VET's 105.49%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
10.53%
Less than half of VET's 24.68%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
4.83%
Less than half of VET's -42.69%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Both VET and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
3.21%
Less than half of VET's -1.04%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
2.00%
Above 1.5x VET's 0.37%. Michael Burry suspects a looming risk from large additions to LT liabilities.
3.68%
Less than half of VET's -23.52%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.52%
Less than half of VET's -14.98%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.23%
Below half VET's 31.50%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
1.86%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-100.00%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
4.93%
Below half VET's 11.83%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
5.27%
Below half VET's -4.45%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.65%
Less than half of VET's -42.69%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
4.11%
Less than half of VET's -32.16%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
