40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-38.42%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-38.42% vs VET's -49.24%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-38.42%
Similar yoy growth to VET's -42.07%. Walter Schloss would note comparable liquidity expansions. Examine capital usage strategies.
-23.94%
Receivables growth less than half of VET's 8.35%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-59.38%
Inventory growth below half of VET's 20.58%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
49.34%
Other current assets growth 50-75% of VET's 93.52%. Bruce Berkowitz notes fewer expansions. Possibly simpler working capital.
-10.54%
0.75-0.9x VET's -12.80%. Bill Ackman would ask if competitor is building short-term resources more aggressively.
-5.22%
Below half VET's 6.99%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
-11.10%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.10%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-94.34%
Above 1.5x VET's -3.70%. Michael Burry warns of potential hidden liabilities or intangible bloat.
-5.85%
Below half of VET's 5.91%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.43%
Below half of VET's 2.96%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-39.21%
Less than half of VET's 31.48%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.27%
Less than half of VET's -100.00%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-25.42%
Less than half of VET's 16.46%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
23.44%
Less than half of VET's -30.09%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.55%
Less than half of VET's 15.15%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-61.67%
Less than half of VET's 46.34%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-5.79%
Less than half of VET's 4.61%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.61%
Less than half of VET's 7.46%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.62%
Below half VET's -8.83%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-63.48%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.83%
≥ 1.5x VET's -1.45%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
-6.43%
Below half VET's 2.96%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.83%
Less than half of VET's -30.09%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
27.05%
Less than half of VET's -13.21%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
