40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
316.97%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth at least 1.5x VET's 9.76%. Mohnish Pabrai might see this as a favorable liquidity edge, provided funds are well deployed.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
316.97%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x VET's 17.97%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
7.14%
Receivables growth less than half of VET's -26.12%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
2.39%
Inventory growth below half of VET's 35.13%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-69.59%
Above 1.5x VET's -1.54%. Michael Burry might investigate for potential short-term asset misclassification or risk.
-3.15%
Below half of VET's -17.29%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
2.95%
Below half VET's 21.75%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
6.84%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.84%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-1.99%
Both VET and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.39%
Less than half of VET's -49.29%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
10.97%
Below half of VET's 23.36%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.58%
Below half of VET's 19.49%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
22.74%
50-75% of VET's 36.16%. Bruce Berkowitz notes the company is paying suppliers faster or not stretching terms as competitor does.
-20.00%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
66.98%
Similar yoy tax payables growth to VET's 72.93%. Walter Schloss sees no major difference in near-term tax obligations.
42.52%
Higher Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating better performance.
-14.29%
Less than half of VET's -58.24%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
24.29%
50-75% of VET's 32.71%. Bruce Berkowitz notes the firm keeps current liabilities growth relatively low.
61.67%
1.1-1.25x VET's 50.86%. Bill Ackman questions if the firm is incurring more long-term obligations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.08%
Less than half of VET's -1.99%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-47.79%
Less than half of VET's 67.00%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
14.90%
Less than half of VET's 40.72%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.27%
Less than half of VET's 39.35%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.51%
Below half VET's -9.43%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
66.64%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.94%
Below half VET's -2.21%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
9.58%
Below half VET's 19.49%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-1.99%
Below half VET's 710.79%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
59.39%
1.1-1.25x VET's 50.86%. Bill Ackman questions if the firm is outpacing competitor in borrowing.
49.51%
Similar yoy changes to VET's 51.26%. Walter Schloss sees parallel net leverage strategies.
