40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-53.36%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-53.36% vs VET's -46.06%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.36%
Cash + STI yoy 1.25-1.5x VET's -43.78%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if the firm is preparing for expansions or simply hoarding.
11.27%
Receivables growth above 1.5x VET's 4.98%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
25.00%
Inventory growth above 1.5x VET's 4.11%. Michael Burry might suspect a looming inventory glut. Check free cash flow impact.
301.83%
Above 1.5x VET's 66.20%. Michael Burry might investigate for potential short-term asset misclassification or risk.
-19.93%
1.25-1.5x VET's -13.83%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if strong current asset growth is used effectively.
2.24%
Below half VET's 4.62%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
2.22%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.22%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
81.10%
Below half of VET's -95.08%. Michael Burry sees possible underinvestment in long-term assets. Verify capital constraints.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1600.00%
Above 1.5x VET's 816.39%. Michael Burry warns of potential hidden liabilities or intangible bloat.
4.52%
1.25-1.5x VET's 4.11%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if expansions surpass competitor's pace but remain justified.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.33%
Below half of VET's 1.90%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-2.01%
Less than half of VET's -5.21%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Below half of VET's 413.06%. David Dodd notes smaller yoy tax burden vs. competitor. Check consistent profit levels.
-100.00%
Both VET and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
106.35%
Less than half of VET's -6.35%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-39.69%
Above 1.5x VET's -0.23%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
0.48%
Less than half of VET's 28.52%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.14%
Less than half of VET's -5.46%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
7.10%
Less than half of VET's -55.87%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
4.81%
Less than half of VET's 18.03%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.16%
Less than half of VET's 13.82%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.74%
≥ 1.5x VET's 3.92%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
21.06%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.06%
≥ 1.5x VET's 0.94%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
0.33%
Below half VET's 1.90%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
81.10%
Below half VET's -80.07%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
0.46%
Less than half of VET's 28.52%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
66.33%
Less than half of VET's 150.33%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
