40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-5.51%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-5.51% vs VET's -58.18%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.51%
Below half of VET's -55.51%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
3.32%
Receivables growth less than half of VET's -11.28%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.97%
Other current assets growth < half of VET's -29.80%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
4.70%
Below half of VET's -33.49%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-6.33%
Below half VET's 3.17%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
0.57%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.57%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-13.74%
Below half of VET's -37.25%. Michael Burry sees possible underinvestment in long-term assets. Verify capital constraints.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
625.85%
Higher Other Non-Current Assets Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1.58%
0.5-0.75x VET's 2.83%. Martin Whitman wonders if there's insufficient reinvestment vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.81%
Below half of VET's -2.91%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-7.31%
Less than half of VET's -27.46%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
33.84%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.42%
Similar yoy changes to VET's -44.00%. Walter Schloss finds parallel near-term liability trends.
7.75%
Less than half of VET's -28.50%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
0.11%
Less than half of VET's -2.16%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
5.96%
Higher Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating better performance.
1.99%
Less than half of VET's -0.80%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-25.00%
Less than half of VET's 1.79%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
1.90%
Less than half of VET's -0.30%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.14%
Less than half of VET's -9.19%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.20%
Below half VET's 217.70%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
10.58%
Less than half of VET's 53.16%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.44%
Below half VET's 5.88%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
1.81%
Below half VET's -2.91%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-13.74%
0.5-0.75x VET's -24.42%. Martin Whitman sees possible missed opportunities vs. competitor.
5.89%
Less than half of VET's -2.16%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
6.07%
Less than half of VET's 50.61%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
