40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
226.91%
Cash & equivalents growing 226.91% while VET's declined -47.93%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
226.91%
Below half of VET's -51.12%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-2.77%
Receivables growth less than half of VET's 15.99%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-100.00%
Inventory growth above 1.5x VET's -41.79%. Michael Burry might suspect a looming inventory glut. Check free cash flow impact.
3.16%
Other current assets growth < half of VET's -50.54%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
19.06%
Below half of VET's -22.59%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-44.71%
Below half VET's 8.03%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
6.44%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.44%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-100.00%
Both VET and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
34.57%
Above 1.5x VET's 11.15%. Michael Burry suspects major tax losses or deferrals building up, raising concerns about sustained profitability.
1413.21%
Higher Other Non-Current Assets Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-40.14%
Below half of VET's 8.27%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-31.54%
Below half of VET's 3.36%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
261.83%
Less than half of VET's -15.79%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-100.00%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-91.87%
Below half of VET's 109.69%. David Dodd notes smaller yoy tax burden vs. competitor. Check consistent profit levels.
-100.00%
Both VET and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
628.81%
Exceeding 1.5x VET's 117.81%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
7.84%
Above 1.5x VET's 0.46%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
0.18%
Above 1.5x VET's 0.10%. Michael Burry suspects significant leverage additions. Check coverage.
10.06%
Higher Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating better performance.
-84.61%
Less than half of VET's 6.21%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-99.92%
Less than half of VET's 9.66%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-20.76%
Less than half of VET's 4.88%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.18%
Less than half of VET's 3.34%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
-100.00%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-60.10%
Below half VET's 614.16%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
209.74%
Above 1.5x VET's 22.11%. Michael Burry sees a significant jump in intangible or market-based gains. Scrutinize risk of reversal.
-100.00%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-48.09%
Below half VET's 3.38%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-31.54%
Below half VET's 3.36%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Similar yoy to VET's -100.00%. Walter Schloss notes parallel moves in the investment portfolio.
-5.08%
Less than half of VET's 0.10%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-28.19%
Less than half of VET's 69.08%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
