40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-9.47%
Cash & equivalents declining -9.47% while VET's grows 72.84%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.47%
Below half of VET's 72.84%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-32.09%
Receivables growth above 1.5x VET's -12.83%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
459.21%
Other current assets growth < half of VET's -64.24%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-14.00%
Below half of VET's 12.23%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
1.63%
Below half VET's 3.41%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
-1.51%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.51%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-51.11%
Both VET and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
-1.08%
Less than half of VET's 0.52%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
31.28%
Higher Other Non-Current Assets Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1.01%
Below half of VET's 3.21%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.39%
Below half of VET's 4.15%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
322.06%
Above 1.5x VET's 7.02%. Michael Burry questions if payables are being stretched to avoid short-term borrowing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-86.67%
Below half of VET's 50.80%. David Dodd notes smaller yoy tax burden vs. competitor. Check consistent profit levels.
-85.74%
Both VET and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
202.06%
Less than half of VET's -2.68%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-2.03%
Less than half of VET's 10.12%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-0.22%
Less than half of VET's 11.02%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.45%
Less than half of VET's 77.28%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
0.11%
Less than half of VET's 5.28%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.31%
Less than half of VET's 6.32%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.04%
Less than half of VET's 1.09%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
-25.56%
≥ 1.5x VET's -7.48%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
-2.39%
50-75% of VET's -4.11%. Bruce Berkowitz notes relatively lower AOCI expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.20%
Below half VET's 1.61%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-3.39%
Below half VET's 4.15%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-51.11%
Both VET and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
-0.36%
Less than half of VET's 11.02%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
4.28%
Less than half of VET's -0.68%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
