40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-21.24%
Cash & equivalents declining -21.24% while VET's grows 52.09%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.24%
Below half of VET's 52.09%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
114.38%
Receivables growth less than half of VET's -6.18%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
81.02%
Inventory growth below half of VET's -5.60%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-25.81%
Above 1.5x VET's -3.67%. Michael Burry might investigate for potential short-term asset misclassification or risk.
-13.73%
Below half of VET's 24.92%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
0.98%
Below half VET's 6.40%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
-2.38%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.38%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
28.51%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating better performance.
-8.48%
Above 1.5x VET's -4.95%. Michael Burry suspects major tax losses or deferrals building up, raising concerns about sustained profitability.
-15.71%
Higher Other Non-Current Assets Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-0.39%
Below half of VET's 5.66%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.00%
Below half of VET's 8.30%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-82.93%
Above 1.5x VET's -4.72%. Michael Burry questions if payables are being stretched to avoid short-term borrowing.
-33.33%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
38.10%
Below half of VET's -33.28%. David Dodd notes smaller yoy tax burden vs. competitor. Check consistent profit levels.
2969.23%
Higher Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating better performance.
26050.00%
Less than half of VET's -26.72%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-7.37%
50-75% of VET's -10.86%. Bruce Berkowitz notes the firm keeps current liabilities growth relatively low.
-0.41%
Less than half of VET's 26.75%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.14%
Above 1.5x VET's -1.49%. Michael Burry suspects a looming risk from large additions to LT liabilities.
-2.39%
Less than half of VET's 13.76%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.62%
Less than half of VET's 8.54%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
-0.12%
Less than half of VET's 1.17%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
-13.14%
Below half VET's 62.06%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
3.79%
Less than half of VET's 28670.91%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
100.00%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-4.91%
Below half VET's 8.03%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-4.00%
Below half VET's 8.30%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
28.51%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating better performance.
-0.48%
Less than half of VET's 26.75%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
10.52%
50-75% of VET's 14.39%. Bruce Berkowitz notes comparatively lower net debt expansion.
