40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
22.94%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth at least 1.5x VET's 9.36%. Mohnish Pabrai might see this as a favorable liquidity edge, provided funds are well deployed.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.94%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x VET's 9.36%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
-3.69%
Receivables growth above 1.5x VET's -0.18%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
-4.28%
Inventory growth below half of VET's 27.13%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-2.99%
Other current assets growth < half of VET's -20.03%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
10.32%
≥ 1.5x VET's 5.35%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
11.42%
0.5-0.75x VET's 15.24%. Martin Whitman might see a risk of falling behind in asset investment or shifting strategy.
-1.75%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.75%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-50.87%
Both VET and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
-19.13%
Similar yoy growth to VET's -18.50%. Walter Schloss sees comparable tax asset changes or loss usage.
46.81%
Higher Other Non-Current Assets Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
8.45%
0.5-0.75x VET's 13.49%. Martin Whitman wonders if there's insufficient reinvestment vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.90%
0.5-0.75x VET's 12.68%. Martin Whitman worries about slower asset growth than competitor. Is it strategy or constraint?
2.62%
Less than half of VET's -6.63%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-100.00%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
100.00%
Below half of VET's -14.82%. David Dodd notes smaller yoy tax burden vs. competitor. Check consistent profit levels.
-100.00%
Both VET and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
-21.21%
Exceeding 1.5x VET's -10.00%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
-10.96%
1.25-1.5x VET's -7.67%. Martin Whitman is wary of bigger short-term burdens.
0.41%
Less than half of VET's 26.98%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.57%
Less than half of VET's 12.04%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
1.15%
Less than half of VET's 20.59%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.38%
Less than half of VET's 14.98%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
55.19%
Above 1.5x VET's 17.05%. Michael Burry suspects heavy new equity expansion or dilution.
10.60%
Below half VET's -183.10%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-0.28%
Less than half of VET's -46.18%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
-56.01%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
30.07%
≥ 1.5x VET's 10.09%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
8.90%
0.5-0.75x VET's 12.68%. Martin Whitman sees underexpansion or possible missed opportunities.
-50.87%
Both VET and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
-1.51%
Less than half of VET's 26.98%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-9.98%
Less than half of VET's 30.35%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
