40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-75.57%
Cash & equivalents declining -75.57% while VET's grows 11.16%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.57%
Below half of VET's 11.16%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-20.11%
Receivables growth above 1.5x VET's -8.58%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
10.89%
Inventory growth below half of VET's -22.00%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-22.16%
Other current assets growth < half of VET's -62.24%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-48.38%
≥ 1.5x VET's -8.36%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
-12.09%
≥ 1.5x VET's -0.39%. David Dodd sees more aggressive capex. Confirm it's not overspending.
0.42%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.42%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-15.38%
Both VET and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
8.02%
1.25-1.5x VET's 6.12%. Martin Whitman would watch for bigger net operating losses or changes in tax strategy.
-8.25%
Higher Other Non-Current Assets Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-9.74%
≥ 1.5x VET's -0.15%. David Dodd sees significantly higher long-term asset buildup. Confirm synergy with strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.61%
≥ 1.5x VET's -0.75%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
-8.76%
Less than half of VET's -28.31%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-100.00%
Less than half of VET's 0.10%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
-87.50%
Below half of VET's 98.82%. David Dodd notes smaller yoy tax burden vs. competitor. Check consistent profit levels.
-100.00%
Below half of VET's 36.98%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
-49.60%
Less than half of VET's 25.11%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-45.47%
Above 1.5x VET's -12.69%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
3.16%
1.1-1.25x VET's 2.69%. Bill Ackman questions if the firm is incurring more long-term obligations.
1.26%
Higher Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating better performance.
-75.79%
Less than half of VET's 2.03%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-28.75%
Above 1.5x VET's -2.34%. Michael Burry suspects a looming risk from large additions to LT liabilities.
-5.86%
Less than half of VET's 0.64%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.71%
Above 1.5x VET's -2.28%. Michael Burry sees a potential leverage warning sign.
0.37%
Less than half of VET's 5.40%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
-48.56%
0.5-0.75x VET's -69.16%. Martin Whitman is wary of weaker retention or lower profitability.
-4.54%
Less than half of VET's 80.04%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
-0.37%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-17.86%
Below half VET's 1.21%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-16.61%
≥ 1.5x VET's -0.75%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
-15.38%
Both VET and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
-12.14%
Less than half of VET's 2.16%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
6.34%
Above 1.5x VET's 1.56%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.
