40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-29.03%
Cash & equivalents declining -29.03% while VET's grows 51.79%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.03%
Below half of VET's 51.79%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-6.13%
Receivables growth less than half of VET's 2.28%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-69.64%
Inventory growth above 1.5x VET's -15.12%. Michael Burry might suspect a looming inventory glut. Check free cash flow impact.
-4.24%
Other current assets growth < half of VET's 255.18%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-10.78%
Below half of VET's 26.48%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-13.86%
≥ 1.5x VET's -0.69%. David Dodd sees more aggressive capex. Confirm it's not overspending.
-1.75%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.75%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
363.64%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating better performance.
103.45%
Above 1.5x VET's 10.84%. Michael Burry suspects major tax losses or deferrals building up, raising concerns about sustained profitability.
-15.26%
Higher Other Non-Current Assets Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-8.99%
≥ 1.5x VET's -0.15%. David Dodd sees significantly higher long-term asset buildup. Confirm synergy with strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.18%
Below half of VET's 1.67%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-7.82%
Less than half of VET's 0.40%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Below half of VET's -23.33%. David Dodd notes smaller yoy tax burden vs. competitor. Check consistent profit levels.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.76%
Less than half of VET's -11.55%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-11.79%
Above 1.5x VET's -1.03%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
0.26%
Less than half of VET's 5.84%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
-1.87%
Both VET and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
-92.28%
Above 1.5x VET's -8.07%. Michael Burry sees a much bigger deferred tax load building up.
-20.66%
Less than half of VET's 0.15%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-4.65%
Less than half of VET's 3.56%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.80%
Less than half of VET's 2.66%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.43%
Less than half of VET's 2.18%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
-73.41%
0.75-0.9x VET's -88.10%. Bill Ackman questions if competitor reinvests profits more robustly.
15.78%
Less than half of VET's 1483.81%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
-0.43%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-14.05%
Below half VET's 0.44%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-9.18%
Below half VET's 1.67%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
363.64%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating better performance.
-1.51%
Less than half of VET's 4.77%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
0.34%
Less than half of VET's 1.37%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
