40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-23.01%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-23.01% vs VET's -71.99%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.01%
Below half of VET's -71.99%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
37.45%
Receivables growth above 1.5x VET's 1.34%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
-26.47%
Similar inventory growth to VET's -25.05%. Walter Schloss notes comparable inventory strategies or sector norms.
-15.11%
Other current assets growth < half of VET's 40.07%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-14.11%
0.5-0.75x VET's -25.45%. Martin Whitman might see risk if this hampers near-term financial flexibility.
-14.15%
≥ 1.5x VET's -4.06%. David Dodd sees more aggressive capex. Confirm it's not overspending.
-0.78%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.78%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
215.69%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating better performance.
40.94%
Less than half of VET's -25.31%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
-52.41%
Less than half of VET's 266.70%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-8.99%
≥ 1.5x VET's -4.76%. David Dodd sees significantly higher long-term asset buildup. Confirm synergy with strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.54%
1.25-1.5x VET's -6.52%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a stronger asset build. Check if it's producing returns.
-83.04%
Less than half of VET's 21.74%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.00%
Below half of VET's -69.98%. David Dodd notes smaller yoy tax burden vs. competitor. Check consistent profit levels.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
433.33%
Less than half of VET's -34.43%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-16.37%
Less than half of VET's 6.07%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-12.97%
Above 1.5x VET's -8.44%. Michael Burry suspects significant leverage additions. Check coverage.
-0.42%
Both VET and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
20.00%
Less than half of VET's -2.28%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-0.85%
Less than half of VET's -11.63%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-9.32%
Similar yoy to VET's -9.56%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions in long-term liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.38%
Above 1.5x VET's -6.61%. Michael Burry sees a potential leverage warning sign.
-26.98%
Less than half of VET's 2.24%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
-143.07%
≥ 1.5x VET's -64.87%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
7.67%
Less than half of VET's 19.56%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
100.00%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-8.22%
1.25-1.5x VET's -6.40%. Bruce Berkowitz notes an above-average equity expansion.
-9.54%
1.25-1.5x VET's -6.52%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if expansions are well-justified by ROI.
215.69%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating better performance.
-10.00%
1.25-1.5x VET's -7.11%. Martin Whitman is wary of bigger debt expansions vs. competitor.
-9.39%
Above 1.5x VET's -0.06%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.
