40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-18.08%
Cash & equivalents declining -18.08% while VET's grows 51.76%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
-100.00%
Both VET and the company show zero Short-Term Investments Growth.
-18.08%
Below half of VET's 51.76%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-36.84%
Receivables growth above 1.5x VET's -20.54%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
-100.00%
Inventory growth below half of VET's 32.58%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-3.47%
Other current assets growth < half of VET's 12.98%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-6.60%
≥ 1.5x VET's -0.22%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
-6.70%
≥ 1.5x VET's -2.69%. David Dodd sees more aggressive capex. Confirm it's not overspending.
1.61%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.61%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-100.00%
Both VET and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
29.14%
Less than half of VET's -26.95%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
85.14%
Above 1.5x VET's 14.37%. Michael Burry warns of potential hidden liabilities or intangible bloat.
-2.39%
0.5-0.75x VET's -3.47%. Martin Whitman wonders if there's insufficient reinvestment vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.82%
0.75-0.9x VET's -3.25%. Bill Ackman questions if competitor invests more aggressively for growth.
414.17%
Less than half of VET's -23.69%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Similar yoy growth to VET's -100.00%. Walter Schloss notes parallel approach to deferred revenue.
-91.88%
Less than half of VET's 4.42%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
1.95%
Less than half of VET's -56.08%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
1.29%
Less than half of VET's 22.96%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
6.04%
Higher Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating better performance.
8.33%
Less than half of VET's -4.79%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
4.22%
Less than half of VET's -0.55%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
2.39%
Less than half of VET's 14.23%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.33%
Less than half of VET's -0.84%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
37.50%
Above 1.5x VET's 2.39%. Michael Burry suspects heavy new equity expansion or dilution.
-194.06%
≥ 1.5x VET's -29.17%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
-19.42%
Similar yoy to VET's -24.05%. Walter Schloss sees parallel comprehensive income changes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.73%
≥ 1.5x VET's -6.31%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
-2.82%
0.75-0.9x VET's -3.25%. Bill Ackman wonders if competitor invests or leverages more aggressively.
-100.00%
Both VET and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
1.00%
Less than half of VET's 2.94%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
1.77%
1.1-1.25x VET's 1.46%. Bill Ackman questions if net debt is increasing faster than competitor.
