40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-37.29%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-37.29% vs VET's -98.17%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
-100.00%
Both VET and the company show zero Short-Term Investments Growth.
-37.29%
Below half of VET's -98.17%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
77.76%
Receivables growth less than half of VET's -19.83%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
290.91%
Similar to VET's 297.39%. Walter Schloss would confirm standard short-term asset patterns.
-11.96%
Below half of VET's -30.07%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
2.57%
Below half VET's -0.09%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
0.18%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.18%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
315.38%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating better performance.
-1.93%
Less than half of VET's -24.02%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
6.25%
Less than half of VET's 367.07%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
2.14%
Below half of VET's -0.93%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.29%
Below half of VET's -2.54%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
376.67%
Above 1.5x VET's 4.49%. Michael Burry questions if payables are being stretched to avoid short-term borrowing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.00%
Below half of VET's 21.83%. David Dodd notes smaller yoy tax burden vs. competitor. Check consistent profit levels.
-100.00%
Both VET and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
-89.69%
Exceeding 1.5x VET's -28.12%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
-15.56%
Above 1.5x VET's -7.76%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.99%
Both VET and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
3.23%
Above 1.5x VET's 0.40%. Michael Burry sees a much bigger deferred tax load building up.
5.94%
Less than half of VET's -36.25%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-1.64%
Less than half of VET's -5.16%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.19%
Similar yoy to VET's -5.46%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions in total liabilities.
28.55%
Above 1.5x VET's 1.65%. Michael Burry suspects heavy new equity expansion or dilution.
34.72%
Below half VET's -3.18%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-1.40%
Less than half of VET's 36.84%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.51%
≥ 1.5x VET's 2.11%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
0.29%
Below half VET's -2.54%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
315.38%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating better performance.
-1.10%
Less than half of VET's -6.95%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
4.95%
Less than half of VET's -2.61%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
