40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
83.04%
Cash & equivalents growing 83.04% while VET's declined -38.64%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.04%
Below half of VET's -38.64%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-16.54%
Receivables growth less than half of VET's 7.75%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.09%
Other current assets growth < half of VET's -48.16%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
1.51%
Similar yoy growth to VET's 1.61%. Walter Schloss notes comparable short-term expansions. Investigate quality of these assets.
2.31%
0.5-0.75x VET's 4.17%. Martin Whitman might see a risk of falling behind in asset investment or shifting strategy.
0.47%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.47%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-28.65%
Both VET and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
0.39%
Less than half of VET's 7.28%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
-9.09%
Less than half of VET's -35.40%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
1.22%
Below half of VET's 4.31%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.26%
Below half of VET's 4.15%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
7.29%
Less than half of VET's -3.71%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.00%
Below half of VET's 22.58%. David Dodd notes smaller yoy tax burden vs. competitor. Check consistent profit levels.
-75.00%
Both VET and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
12.22%
50-75% of VET's 19.51%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a more controlled liability line.
6.50%
Less than half of VET's 25.58%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.34%
Higher Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating better performance.
3.13%
Above 1.5x VET's 0.57%. Michael Burry sees a much bigger deferred tax load building up.
0.52%
Less than half of VET's 3.50%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
0.46%
Less than half of VET's 9.19%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.24%
Less than half of VET's 11.90%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
-0.31%
Less than half of VET's 0.15%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
-1.04%
Below half VET's -8.21%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
2.12%
Less than half of VET's -23.31%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.05%
Below half VET's -4.71%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
1.26%
Below half VET's 4.15%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-28.65%
Both VET and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
-0.03%
Less than half of VET's 12.29%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-5.21%
Less than half of VET's 13.54%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
