40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-65.14%
Cash & equivalents declining -65.14% while VET's grows 572.24%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-65.14%
Below half of VET's 572.24%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
5.50%
Receivables growth less than half of VET's -22.16%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.32%
1.25-1.5x VET's 30.34%. Martin Whitman worries about added complexity or intangible expansions.
-7.23%
≥ 1.5x VET's -1.96%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
1.80%
Below half VET's -2.84%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
0.81%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.81%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-11.21%
Both VET and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
-10.59%
Similar yoy growth to VET's -9.92%. Walter Schloss sees comparable tax asset changes or loss usage.
-0.15%
Less than half of VET's -9.55%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
1.10%
Below half of VET's -3.12%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.29%
Below half of VET's -3.06%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
7.44%
Less than half of VET's -46.04%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-100.00%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
54.44%
Exceeding 1.5x VET's 8.49%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
-14.36%
Similar yoy to VET's -18.13%. Walter Schloss sees parallel short-term liability strategies.
11.95%
Above 1.5x VET's 1.46%. Michael Burry suspects significant leverage additions. Check coverage.
0.43%
Higher Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating better performance.
157.14%
Less than half of VET's -0.89%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
1.71%
Less than half of VET's -3.42%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
9.66%
Less than half of VET's -0.37%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.60%
Less than half of VET's -2.71%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
-5.54%
Less than half of VET's 1.60%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
127.08%
Below half VET's -7.76%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-1.84%
Less than half of VET's -19.53%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.33%
Similar yoy to VET's -3.51%. Walter Schloss sees parallel net worth trends.
0.29%
Below half VET's -3.06%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-11.21%
Both VET and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
2.84%
Above 1.5x VET's 1.26%. Michael Burry sees a major jump. Investigate leverage rationale.
7.12%
Less than half of VET's -0.25%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
