40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-56.84%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-56.84% vs VET's -42.69%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
-100.00%
Both VET and the company show zero Short-Term Investments Growth.
-56.84%
Cash + STI yoy 1.25-1.5x VET's -42.69%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if the firm is preparing for expansions or simply hoarding.
4.80%
Receivables growth less than half of VET's -10.89%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
406.88%
Above 1.5x VET's 84.17%. Michael Burry might investigate for potential short-term asset misclassification or risk.
19.90%
Below half of VET's -0.85%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-7.13%
Below half VET's -33.39%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
-2.14%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.14%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-96.43%
Both VET and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
-10.15%
Less than half of VET's 114.64%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
677.14%
Above 1.5x VET's 269.13%. Michael Burry warns of potential hidden liabilities or intangible bloat.
-1.80%
Below half of VET's -27.02%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.08%
Below half of VET's -25.46%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
461.97%
Above 1.5x VET's 78.59%. Michael Burry questions if payables are being stretched to avoid short-term borrowing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.94%
Both VET and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
-87.72%
Exceeding 1.5x VET's -37.85%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
-11.18%
Less than half of VET's 21.65%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
0.46%
Less than half of VET's 3.60%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
0.46%
Higher Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating better performance.
58.53%
Less than half of VET's -6.42%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-1.67%
Less than half of VET's -35.81%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
0.32%
Less than half of VET's -9.44%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.10%
Less than half of VET's -5.65%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
19.86%
Above 1.5x VET's 0.24%. Michael Burry suspects heavy new equity expansion or dilution.
94.30%
Below half VET's -78.65%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-13.00%
Less than half of VET's 175.42%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.63%
Below half VET's -53.03%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
0.08%
Below half VET's -25.46%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-96.43%
Both VET and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
-2.20%
Less than half of VET's 3.35%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-0.91%
Less than half of VET's 4.02%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
