40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-68.75%
Cash & equivalents declining -68.75% while VET's grows 29.31%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-68.75%
Below half of VET's 29.31%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-14.75%
Receivables growth less than half of VET's 9.33%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-55.88%
Similar to VET's -52.51%. Walter Schloss would confirm standard short-term asset patterns.
2.30%
Below half of VET's -2.48%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
2.13%
≥ 1.5x VET's 0.28%. David Dodd sees more aggressive capex. Confirm it's not overspending.
1.20%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.20%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
276.47%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating better performance.
204.00%
Less than half of VET's -1.19%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
-95.51%
1.1-1.25x VET's -85.13%. Bill Ackman questions if the firm invests in intangible or other non-core areas more aggressively.
-5.14%
≥ 1.5x VET's -0.28%. David Dodd sees significantly higher long-term asset buildup. Confirm synergy with strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.54%
≥ 1.5x VET's -0.42%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
-80.53%
Less than half of VET's 9.54%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43866.67%
Higher Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating better performance.
402.36%
Exceeding 1.5x VET's 60.93%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
38.54%
1.1-1.25x VET's 30.91%. Bill Ackman questions if the firm is taking on more near-term obligations than competitor.
-10.85%
Above 1.5x VET's -6.71%. Michael Burry suspects significant leverage additions. Check coverage.
-11.13%
Both VET and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
-20.00%
Less than half of VET's 1.79%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-8.75%
Less than half of VET's 11.61%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-9.35%
Above 1.5x VET's -2.34%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.60%
Less than half of VET's 1.16%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
-99.96%
Less than half of VET's 0.16%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
-12.42%
≥ 1.5x VET's -1.73%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
5.08%
Less than half of VET's -8.26%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.83%
≥ 1.5x VET's -5.49%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
-4.54%
≥ 1.5x VET's -0.42%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
276.47%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating better performance.
-1.95%
Less than half of VET's -6.63%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-1.68%
Less than half of VET's -6.72%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
