40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
38.97%
Cash & equivalents growing 38.97% while VET's declined -24.62%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
-100.00%
Similar yoy growth to VET's -100.00%. Walter Schloss would note comparable strategies in building short-term reserves.
38.97%
Below half of VET's -24.62%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
46.22%
Receivables growth above 1.5x VET's 20.74%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.06%
Other current assets growth < half of VET's 35.08%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
36.61%
≥ 1.5x VET's 16.73%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
-7.30%
Below half VET's 2.33%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
0.38%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.38%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-88.89%
Both VET and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
-87.74%
Less than half of VET's 21.16%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
6341.18%
Higher Other Non-Current Assets Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
2.12%
0.5-0.75x VET's 3.95%. Martin Whitman wonders if there's insufficient reinvestment vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.01%
1.25-1.5x VET's 4.98%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a stronger asset build. Check if it's producing returns.
538.05%
Above 1.5x VET's 2.70%. Michael Burry questions if payables are being stretched to avoid short-term borrowing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.00%
Below half of VET's 155.02%. David Dodd notes smaller yoy tax burden vs. competitor. Check consistent profit levels.
-100.00%
Both VET and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
64.69%
50-75% of VET's 114.25%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a more controlled liability line.
44.94%
Similar yoy to VET's 41.25%. Walter Schloss sees parallel short-term liability strategies.
-0.23%
Less than half of VET's -16.41%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Both VET and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
125.00%
Above 1.5x VET's 5.10%. Michael Burry sees a much bigger deferred tax load building up.
-1.34%
Above 1.5x VET's -0.07%. Michael Burry suspects a looming risk from large additions to LT liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.75%
Above 1.5x VET's 0.82%. Michael Burry sees a potential leverage warning sign.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.54%
Below half VET's 12.17%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
2.47%
Less than half of VET's -130.63%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.69%
Below half VET's 12.70%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
6.01%
1.25-1.5x VET's 4.98%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if expansions are well-justified by ROI.
-88.89%
Below half VET's 13810.24%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-0.05%
Less than half of VET's -16.10%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-1.42%
Less than half of VET's -16.07%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
