40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-80.95%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-80.95% vs VET's -82.14%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-80.95%
Similar yoy growth to VET's -82.14%. Walter Schloss would note comparable liquidity expansions. Examine capital usage strategies.
12.58%
Receivables growth above 1.5x VET's 7.57%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.93%
Above 1.5x VET's -0.21%. Michael Burry might investigate for potential short-term asset misclassification or risk.
-1.39%
Below half of VET's -12.47%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-5.81%
Below half VET's 22.57%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
≥ 1.5x VET's -0.41%. David Dodd sees an aggressive push into LT investments. Confirm risk management.
-100.00%
1.25-1.5x VET's -67.00%. Martin Whitman would watch for bigger net operating losses or changes in tax strategy.
789.44%
Less than half of VET's -68.46%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
2.12%
Below half of VET's 18.81%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.87%
Below half of VET's 15.83%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
327.13%
Above 1.5x VET's 27.97%. Michael Burry questions if payables are being stretched to avoid short-term borrowing.
90.67%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
55.56%
Below half of VET's -6.87%. David Dodd notes smaller yoy tax burden vs. competitor. Check consistent profit levels.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-71.43%
Exceeding 1.5x VET's -9.67%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
18.02%
Similar yoy to VET's 17.61%. Walter Schloss sees parallel short-term liability strategies.
-9.46%
Less than half of VET's 94.51%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.52%
Above 1.5x VET's 3.99%. Michael Burry sees a much bigger deferred tax load building up.
31.69%
Less than half of VET's -10.42%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
2.05%
Less than half of VET's 29.34%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.85%
Less than half of VET's 27.17%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.74%
Below half VET's 0.85%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
0.90%
Less than half of VET's 53.49%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.43%
Below half VET's 2.50%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
1.87%
Below half VET's 15.83%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-100.00%
≥ 1.5x VET's -0.41%. David Dodd sees far stronger investment expansions than competitor.
7.39%
Less than half of VET's 89.59%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
7.98%
Less than half of VET's 115.10%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
