40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
56.44%
Some net income increase while BTE is negative at -12.84%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-5.86%
Negative yoy D&A while BTE is 0.63%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
26.83%
Well above BTE's 35.69% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-211.41%
Both reduce yoy usage, with BTE at -165.82%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.11%
Some yoy increase while BTE is negative at -33.32%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
32.55%
Some CFO growth while BTE is negative at -26.49%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
5.61%
Some CapEx rise while BTE is negative at -26.71%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
109.11%
We have some outflow growth while BTE is negative at -736.11%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
92.75%
We have mild expansions while BTE is negative at -346.73%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
68.49%
Debt repayment growth of 68.49% while BTE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-31.09%
Negative yoy issuance while BTE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
103.42%
Buyback growth of 103.42% while BTE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.