PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-109.77%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with BTE at -140.19%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
94.22%
Some D&A expansion while BTE is negative at -5.56%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-154.57%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26204.46%
Slight usage while BTE is negative at -589.70%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
410.20%
Well above BTE's 178.98%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
50.48%
Some CFO growth while BTE is negative at -19.35%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-63.46%
Negative yoy CapEx while BTE is 76.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Some acquisitions while BTE is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-100.00%
Negative yoy purchasing while BTE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
483.85%
Liquidation growth of 483.85% while BTE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
175.26%
We have some outflow growth while BTE is negative at -91.11%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-303.68%
We reduce yoy invests while BTE stands at 72.80%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
95.25%
Debt repayment growth of 95.25% while BTE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
3.88%
We slightly raise equity while BTE is negative at -97.51%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
1.88%
Buyback growth of 1.88% while BTE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.