PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-89.54%
Negative net income growth while BTE stands at 48.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
1.22%
Less D&A growth vs. BTE's 102.75%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-27.27%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BTE stands at 132.06%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
393.72%
Slight usage while BTE is negative at -476.43%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.98%
Growth of 14.98% while BTE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-38.83%
Both negative yoy, with BTE at -30.15%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
37.95%
Some CFO growth while BTE is negative at -13.37%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-24.36%
Both yoy lines negative, with BTE at -299.08%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
24525.00%
Acquisition growth of 24525.00% while BTE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
385.71%
Purchases growth of 385.71% while BTE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
24.36%
Liquidation growth of 24.36% while BTE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-284.94%
We reduce yoy other investing while BTE is 209.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-194.64%
Both yoy lines negative, with BTE at -171.88%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-89.47%
Both yoy lines negative, with BTE at -97.47%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.