PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
212.67%
Some net income increase while BTE is negative at -29.39%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-0.49%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with BTE at -54.28%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
382.89%
Well above BTE's 141.56% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
154.37%
Less working capital growth vs. BTE's 545.84%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
159.57%
Growth of 159.57% while BTE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
6.84%
Some yoy increase while BTE is negative at -35.18%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
48.38%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x BTE's 23.07%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-15.78%
Both yoy lines negative, with BTE at -15.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
5.77%
Acquisition growth of 5.77% while BTE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
224.47%
Purchases growth of 224.47% while BTE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
15.78%
Liquidation growth of 15.78% while BTE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-18.37%
We reduce yoy other investing while BTE is 93.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
0.47%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. BTE's 53.93%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while BTE is 186.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while BTE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.