PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
907.47%
Net income growth above 1.5x BTE's 292.32%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
19.00%
D&A growth well above BTE's 6.99%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
63.96%
Well above BTE's 109.49% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-123.68%
Both cut yoy SBC, with BTE at -16.74%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
30.25%
Less working capital growth vs. BTE's 192.81%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.25%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. BTE's 192.81%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-196.00%
Negative yoy while BTE is 15.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-9.26%
Negative yoy CFO while BTE is 128.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-6.79%
Both yoy lines negative, with BTE at -42.34%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
740.95%
Acquisition spending well above BTE's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
1064.52%
Purchases growth of 1064.52% while BTE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-79.82%
We reduce yoy sales while BTE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
37.16%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. BTE's 4018.12%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
355.54%
Investing outflow well above BTE's 103.79%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
92.80%
We repay more while BTE is negative at -36.64%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.