PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-962.12%
Negative net income growth while BTE stands at 51.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
3.33%
Some D&A expansion while BTE is negative at -33.22%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-813.33%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
94.64%
SBC growth well above BTE's 77.00%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
95.74%
Slight usage while BTE is negative at -69.44%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while BTE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.74%
Some yoy usage while BTE is negative at -57.29%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
214.46%
Some yoy increase while BTE is negative at -31.53%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
84.67%
Some CFO growth while BTE is negative at -40.78%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
14.12%
Lower CapEx growth vs. BTE's 32.58%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
113.94%
Acquisition growth of 113.94% while BTE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-14.12%
Negative yoy purchasing while BTE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-40.95%
We reduce yoy sales while BTE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
13.68%
We have some outflow growth while BTE is negative at -42.02%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
104.06%
Investing outflow well above BTE's 16.72%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
94.52%
Debt repayment similar to BTE's 98.78%. Walter Schloss sees parallel liability management or similar free cash flow availability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.