40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
38.07%
Net income growth under 50% of BTE's 100.15%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-5.43%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with BTE at -88.08%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
17.62%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. BTE's 76.78%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
275.00%
SBC growth well above BTE's 106.22%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
1.72%
Less working capital growth vs. BTE's 329.91%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-53.82%
AR is negative yoy while BTE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.72%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. BTE's 172.34%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-253.19%
Both negative yoy, with BTE at -86.38%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-64.96%
Negative yoy CFO while BTE is 1033.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-28.21%
Negative yoy CapEx while BTE is 41.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-99.34%
Negative yoy acquisition while BTE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
290.96%
Purchases growth of 290.96% while BTE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-95.71%
We reduce yoy sales while BTE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-27.76%
Both yoy lines negative, with BTE at -220.85%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-217.12%
We reduce yoy invests while BTE stands at 1.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
78.13%
We repay more while BTE is negative at -26.45%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.